However, the taste and color of all the markers are different, and the purpose of this article is to combat prejudice, and not with personal preferences. Here, in terms of the subtleties of pastel shades, SilkyPix, perhaps, has gone far ahead, but Aperture and Lightroom are still inferior to the program in question. The colors of the developer by default are high-quality, but boring, with the correct picture, close to the natural perception. The default settings in RawTherapee are very good, and you can take pictures without touching anything. It should be noted, however, that novice amateurs who decide to shoot in RAW may not worry about the insufficient level of their knowledge. If you don’t like the way the program performs an action, With RawTherapee this number will not work.
#Rawtherapee software
And it doesn’t matter that most of these advantages are purely imaginary - it’s much more convenient to blame other people's eyes for this than your crooked hands and low-quality software that can’t extract what the photographer needs. This may be considered a drawback - in a more traditional editor, you upload an image, move a couple of sliders and get a finished result, but then when you use the same traditional editor, you usually hear whining: either the sharpness is not enough, then the colors go, then artifacts come out, and even the most cherished - “the matrix / lens does not fully reveal its advantages!”. In terms of controlling the processing algorithms, RawTherapee is perhaps “ahead of the rest”. So, during the initial development (debayerization), in addition to the standard amaze algorithm, another 9 processing options for Bayer mosaics are used to choose from (you can read more about these algorithms here ): It should be noted that the functionality of the program, as well as its interface, is significantly complicated from version to version, requiring in some cases a clear understanding of which algorithm he wants to use to process or improve the image. At the time of writing, the main version of RawTherapee has an index of 4.0.
#Rawtherapee mac os
This developer exists for all major platforms: Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, and, as far as I can tell from import blogs, it is installed on * BSD with some effort. Meanwhile, tools for retouching should always be at hand, and to refuse retouching “for the sake of naturalness of shots” means to make yourself dependent on chance and the vagaries of technology.įurther, I consider RawTherapee as the main tool for basic photo correction, and GIMP almost exclusively as a means of retouching.
Rather, it is a set of assumptions about exactly how an amateur photographer who wants to get high-quality processing of his digital images at the output can use RawTherapee and GIMP for this purpose, avoiding the traditional bottlenecks in this bundle. The following material can not be considered, perhaps, neither a review, nor a brief instruction on the combination of the two products mentioned. This will be discussed below!) It is only important to use it properly. (Yes, I remember about the eight-bit color in GIMP. RawTherapee developer and GIMP photo editor, which are discussed in the article below, relate specifically to freeware software meanwhile, their functionality is almost inferior in nothing, and in some places it significantly surpasses the functionality of a recognized leader.
#Rawtherapee free
But to deal with these excesses is much more correct not by “piracy and theft”, but by purely economic methods, first of all, by comprehensive expansion of the assortment and scope of using various kinds of free and open source software. No, I do not support the idea of paid software (software) on the contrary, I am entirely in favor of curtailing and limiting the appetites of commercial companies, especially those that de facto claim a monopoly in a certain area. It would be strange if the whole article was devoted to the “choice of a loser”, right? In my opinion, the "choice of a loser" is a pirated Adobe Photoshop with a pirated Lightroom as a developer. I’ll immediately reveal the intrigue: to the question asked in the title, I will no doubt give the second of the proposed answers.
0 kommentar(er)
